My full review can be found here: http://jay-othermel.livejournal.com/15399.html
In his Preface, David Rieff writes: “My mother never recanted her opposition to the [Vietnam] war. But she did come to regret, and, unlike so many of her peers...., to publicly recant, her faith in the emancipatory possibilities of Communism, not just in its Soviet, Chinese, or Cuban incarnation, but as a system.”
The previous quotes from Sontag’s journals and notebooks, where she proudly defines her role as that of “adversary,” certainly confirm Rieff’s statement. But “adversary” of what? Aye, there’s the rub. Adversarialism is as adversarialism does. For Sontag it meant, once, putting herself on the line for the Vietnamese revolution. But Rieff has, as he admits, removed all but a few of the journal entries from Sontag’s trip to North Vietnam. He also mentions nothing about any journals from a later visit to China. Their content is unknown, as is their scope and length. Does this apparent ‘reduction’ of the author’s work bring into question the good faith of the editorial enterprise? How can it not?
There are no ages for this title yet.
There are no summaries for this title yet.
There are no notices for this title yet.
There are no quotes for this title yet.